RaymondsIndex

This week handed us the perfect teaching case in cash governance — and it came from the most transparent balance sheet on the planet. Berkshire Hathaway reported a record $397.4 billion in cash and equivalents in the first quarter of 2026, the largest hoard in its history and the first quarterly report under new CEO Greg Abel (Bloomberg, May 2, 2026). It is not alone. Alphabet holds roughly $127 billion, Amazon $126 billion, Microsoft $94.6 billion. Analysts will argue for months about whether Buffett's caution is wisdom or whether the cash is a drag. That argument is healthy — and it is only possible because the cash is disclosed, quarter after quarter, in plain sight. Now hold that image, and invert it. The concept: Cash Governance Index (CGI). In the RaymondsIndex framework, CGI carries 45% of the weight — the single largest component, tied with capital efficiency. It measures three things: the idle-cash ratio (how much cash simply sits), the short-term-instrument ratio (h...

This week the clearest story in global markets wasn't a deal or a default. It was the slow sound of trapped money. Blackstone, alongside EQT and KKR, is openly racing to unlock the roughly $7 trillion of cash parked across Japanese households and balance sheets. Japanese listed companies alone hold around ¥110 trillion in cash and deposits — more than 10% of total assets, against 7–8% in Europe and roughly 6% in the United States. Return on equity has sat below 10% for years. In 2025, activist investors launched a record 56 campaigns in Japan, and they almost all pointed at the same target: capital that has stopped working. This is the signal at the heart of the Capital Efficiency Index, or CEI. CEI is not a measure of how much profit a company reports. It measures whether capital is actually being put to productive use: return on invested capital, asset turnover, and the gap between the cash a company raises and the cash it actually deploys. The distinction matters because cash i...

Every Monday, the same uncomfortable truth resurfaces: by the time a company's distress is legible in its financial statements, the people who needed to act already missed their window. This week's radar makes the point in two languages. The domestic signal. Korea Exchange's review of 2025 fiscal-year filings flagged 42 KOSDAQ companies with delisting triggers — and all 42 traced back to the same root cause: a failed or qualified audit opinion. Twenty-three hit a trigger for the first time this year; eleven failed for a second consecutive year; eight, for a third, and are now suspended pending liquidation trades. More telling than the headline number is a quieter one: newly designated "investment caution" issues rose to 43, a jump of 12 over the prior year. One flagged firm, Samyoung E&C, is simultaneously fighting a management-control lawsuit — a reminder that delisting risk and governance conflict tend to travel together. The global parallel. ...

Korea just gave minority investors a new tool, and it's worth understanding exactly what it can and cannot do. Under an amended Commercial Act, the duty of loyalty owed by company directors has been rewritten. Where the law once required directors to act faithfully "for the company," Article 382-3 now requires them to act for "the company and its shareholders ," and to treat all shareholders fairly. The shareholder-loyalty principle took force in 2025; the broader package — independent-director requirements (one-third of the board for large listed firms), a strengthened 3% voting cap, and the separate election of audit-committee members — phases in through July and September 2026. Alongside it, Korea moved to mandate cancellation of treasury shares, closing a mechanism long used by controlling families to entrench control with little direct ownership. This is a real shift. For the first time, a board that engineers a merger or a dilutive capital raise purely f...

Two take-privates closed within months of each other on opposite sides of the Sea of Japan. They used the same instrument. They produced opposite outcomes for the people who didn't sit at the table. In Korea, a private equity fund took the waste-management company Koentech private in mid-2025 at ₩9,000 per share. The fund assembled control through a tender offer, on-market purchases, and finally a comprehensive share swap. The tender offer fell short of plan — it secured about 20.2% — so the last resisting minority block, roughly 12.9% of the company, was forced out through the swap at that same ₩9,000. An independent valuation had called the price fair. Six months later, with no meaningful change in the business or its end-market, the fund moved to sell the company outright for a price in the mid-₩700 billion range — close to ₩15,000 per share, nearly double. Reporting estimated the squeezed-out minorities' stake carried roughly ₩40 billion of additional value they never rece...

The raid came after the stock had already moved. On May 28, 2026, prosecutors from the Seoul Southern District Prosecutors' Office executed search and seizure warrants at NH Investment & Securities and DI Dongil — a Korean industrial company listed on the KOSPI. The investigation targets an alleged market manipulation scheme in which more than one trillion Korean won was coordinated across dozens of accounts using artificial cross-trades. Prosecutors allege that the manipulation group used a minority shareholder activism campaign as cover, pressuring company management to enter a share buyback trust agreement while quietly managing the stock price behind the scenes. Retail investors, watching the price respond to what appeared to be governance pressure, bought in. They were the designed exit. The same week, across the Pacific On May 6, 2026, the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission — alongside the Department of Justice — charged 21 individuals with a sprawling insider tr...