March 2026 | Relational Risk Evangelist Noah

---

key facts

- BlackRock (approximately $11 trillion in assets under management, the world’s largest asset management company) is pursuing the acquisition of a Minnesota electric power company.

- Critics warn: Electricity rates expected to rise after acquisition + clean energy goals undermined

- Source: The Guardian, September 2025

- Similar cases: BlackRock, Blackstone — Bulk purchases of residential real estate across the U.S. and Europe

---

what's going on

- Public utilities (electricity, water, transportation) are traditionally operated by the government or public institutions.

- Recently, large asset management companies (BlackRock, Macquarie, KKR, etc.) have actively acquired this field.

- Post-acquisition pattern: rate increase + facility investment decrease + shareholder dividend increase

- There is a structural conflict between private rate of return demands and public service obligations.

---

Relational risk analysis

On the surface: Streamlining and modernizing old infrastructure through inflow of private capital.

In practice: Capital reorganizes the business (utility)-community-government triangle.

- Utilities are essential goods without substitutes → pricing power belongs to capital

- Clean energy investment has low short-term returns → PE/management pressures to reduce

- Public interest and investor returns are reorganized into a zero-sum relationship.

---

BlackRock’s public goods capture pattern

Asset Types — BlackRock Movement — Social Impact

Power Utility — Pursuing Acquisition of Minnesota Power Company — Concerns about Rate Increases

Residential real estate — Massive purchases in the U.S. and Europe — Rising rents, housing instability

Infrastructure fund - Acquisition of shares in roads, ports, and airports - Increase in tolls and usage fees

Government bond/bond market — overwhelming market share — excessive concentration of interest rate/liquidity decision-making power

---

Corporate-community relationship risk indicator

1. Major shareholders of utility companies are concentrated in asset management companies → Local community representation 0

2. Absence of public interest representatives on the Board of Directors

3. Increased capital lobbying of rate-setting committees

4. Announcement of cancellation/reduction of clean energy investment plan

---

Links to Lusiani’s (2024) study

Lusiani & DiVito (2024), included in the Relational Risk Paper Collection, demonstrate:

“As market concentration deepens, wealth also becomes more concentrated.”

BlackRock's acquisition of public goods is the biggest real-world test of this proposition.

Market concentration → Utility monopoly → Fee collection rights monopoly → Wealth concentration

---

A word from the preacher

Electricity, water, house.

These are not products. It's a relationship.

The most basic relationship humans have with society.

$11 trillion in capital is trying to buy that relationship.

This is the forefront of capital polarization.

Relational risk captures signals before this capture structure is complete.

---

■ Reference materials

- The Guardian, "Critics say BlackRock's Minnesota utility bid will increase rates – and clean energy goals will suffer" (2025.09)

- Lusiani & DiVito, "Market Concentration and Wealth Concentration" (2024)

- RaymondsRisk white paper: https://www.konnect-ai.net/whitepaper

#relational risk #raymondsrisk #raymondsindex #konnectai #BlackRock #privatization of public goods #capital polarization #utility

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

당신이 놓치고 있는 “관계형 리스크”의 실체

Global Fund Polarization

2027년 변경 적용 | 상장폐지 기준 강화 정책 요약