독립리서치-R | IRP

  Every continued-listing regime has to pick a variable. The choice looks technical and is not. It decides who produces the evidence that ends a listing, and therefore how much time sits between that evidence and the exit. Korea has moved that variable decisively toward price. The minimum market capitalisation for continued KOSDAQ listing was raised from KRW 4.0bn to KRW 15bn early in 2026, then to KRW 20bn from July. A separate rule, also effective July, targets shares trading below KRW 1,000. Both are measured the same way: thirty trading days below the line brings designation as a management issue, and the company must then hold above the line for 45 consecutive trading days inside a 90-day window to avoid a delisting decision. The counts, as reported on 25 September 2026 Between 12 August and that date, 17 KOSDAQ issuers were designated on the market-capitalisation test. Eight KOSDAQ issuers, excluding SPACs, have had delisting decided this year on that test — none in the fi...

기업리서치 이삭엔지니어링 - 기존 주력 고객 매출 확대와 자원순환 업황 개선, 원가율 정상화와 신사업 손익 입증이 다음 과제  기업리서치 - #이삭엔지니어링 #351330 ​  핵심 포인트  2025년 연결 매출 789.9억원(+15.4%),  영업손실 -71.8억원,  매출총이익률 3.4%  10% 이상 고객 3사 매출 239.4억원 → 337.1억원(+40.8%),  연결 매출의 42.7% 매출 증가분 105.4억원 중 83.7%(88.2억원)가 상품 도소매 — 원가율 상승의 첫 요인 관계기업  이삭화유리사이클  2025년 매출 53.0억원,  계열 대여·채권·보증 151.3억원(자본총계의 43.7%) 전환사채 100억원(전환가액 6,668원) 발행,  부채비율 67.0% → 124.1%  보고서 제출일 기준 수주잔고 약 451억원(2025년 매출 대비 약 0.57년분) ​  요약   이삭엔지니어링은 2006년 설립해 2021년 코스닥에 상장한 #반도체 ·철강 설비 제어 엔지니어링 기업이다.  2025년 연결 매출은 789.9억원(+15.4%)으로 회복했으나 영업손실은 -71.8억원으로 확대됐고, 매출총이익률은 2022년 16.0%에서 3.4%까지 3년 연속 하락했다. ​  매출증가분 105.4억원 중 83.7%가 저마진 상품 도소매에서 발생했고, 재료·상품 매입과 진행기준 추정 변경 손실, 재고평가손실이 원가율을 끌어올렸다.  연결 매출의 10% 이상 고객 3사 매출은 239.4억원에서 337.1억원으로 40.8% 늘었으며, 주력 고객인 #SK하이닉스 는 #M15X 가동과 용인 1기 팹 등 설비투자를 확대하고 있다. ​  자원순환 신사업은 관계기업 #이삭화유리사이클 (전처리)이 2025년 매출 53.0억원을 올렸으나, 동사의 관계기업 계열 대여·채권·보증 합계 151....

On 21 September, at a press briefing marking his first year in office, Korea Fair Trade Commission chairman Joo Byung-ki described the Naver Financial–Dunamu share exchange as a combination of dominant platforms across search, simple payments and digital assets. He said the KFTC is examining the deal's competitive effects across a total of 10 connected markets, that it has issued more than ten rounds of data requests, and that the volume of economic analysis makes this a high-difficulty review. He committed to concluding deliberation within the year. Two and a half months earlier, the schedule had already moved. Naver disclosed in July that the shareholder meeting for the comprehensive share exchange was pushed from 18 August to 19 November, and the effective date of the exchange from 30 September to 31 December — the second postponement, against an original plan to close in the first half of the year. Completion requires several separate clearances: KFTC merger approval, approva...

On 18 September 2026, a KOSDAQ-listed company called Satoshi Holdings (223310) filed an amendment to a disclosure it had already made. The placement itself stayed recognisable: 5,509,745 new shares to a single investment partnership at KRW 2,668 per share, KRW 14.7bn in total, locked up at the Korea Securities Depository for one year. What the amendment changed was the table underneath. Working capital fell from KRW 3,999,999,660 to KRW 2,999,999,660. Debt repayment rose from KRW 10,700,000,000 to KRW 11,700,000,000. And the list of debts being repaid gained an entry: the company's 13th-series convertible bond, held by an investment partnership. Eight days before that, on 10 September, the same company had disclosed something that makes the amendment legible. It was buying back, early, a KRW 7.0bn private convertible bond — its 12th series, issued on 9 March 2026 with a maturity of 9 March 2029. The buyback price, principal plus interest, was KRW 7,000,649,003. The disclosure nam...

On 21 September 2026 a KOSDAQ-listed company resolved a third-party share placement of roughly KRW 10bn, disclosed the following morning. The mechanics are ordinary: 4,796,163 new shares at KRW 2,085 apiece — about 16.3% of shares outstanding before the issue — priced at a 10% discount to a reference price of KRW 2,316 struck the day before the board met. Payment is due 9 November 2026, the new shares list on 30 November, and every one of them is locked up for a year. On payment, the largest shareholder changes. The line worth stopping on is not any of those. It is the use-of-proceeds table. Purpose: working capital, in full. Schedule: KRW 4.999bn in 2027, KRW 5.00bn in 2028 and after. Two rows. The year the money actually arrives is not one of them. What that does to the arithmetic Capital efficiency indices read three things: return on invested capital, asset turnover, and the investment gap — the distance between capital a company holds and capital it has put to work. The first ...

Two documents landed this month that look like they belong to different worlds. One is a Nasdaq compliance notice at a US large-cap advertising technology firm. The other is a Korean material-event report about a small block of convertible bonds. They share a structure that is worth a Monday morning. The US filing. On March 25, 2026, The Trade Desk, Inc. (Nasdaq: TTD) filed a Form 8-K. Six days earlier, on March 19, director Alexander Kayyal had informed the company of his resignation, effective immediately. On March 23, Kathryn E. Falberg did the same. The 8-K states that neither resignation resulted from a disagreement with the company on any matter relating to its operations, policies or practices. On March 24 the company notified Nasdaq that it no longer complied with Listing Rules 5605(c)(2)(A) and 5605(d)(2)(A) — the first requiring a minimum of three independent directors on the audit committee, the second a minimum of two on the compensation committee. Nasdaq's notice of...

1. The event On 16 September 2026, at its 16th regular meeting, Korea's Securities and Futures Commission — an arm of the Financial Services Commission — imposed sanctions on Haitai Confectionery and Foods. The findings: revenue and cost of sales were overstated from 2016 through 2019, by 13.678bn won, 15.317bn won, 11.256bn won and 12.777bn won respectively, through false tax invoices and the omission of sales discounts and sales incentives. The commission also found violations in securities registration statements and obstruction of the external audit. The obstruction is the detail that matters here. Haitai presented false transaction records to its auditor, and asked business partners to send false replies to accounts-receivable confirmation requests. Sanctions include a three-year auditor designation, a dismissal recommendation and six-month suspension for the head of the finance division, an action equivalent to a dismissal recommendation against the former auditor, and fin...

약속은 깨져서 위험한 게 아니다 — 조건이 변해도 따라 변하지 않아서 위험하다  [주간 5경로 해부 ②] 약속의 덫(Commitment Trap)   1. 이번 주에 일어난 일 미국 — 가맹점주가 할 수 있는 건 다 하고, 그다음에 파산을 신청했다  미국 웬디스 가맹점주 메리티지 호스피탤리티 그룹(Meritage Hospitality Group) 이 현지시간 목요일 미시간 서부지구 연방파산법원에 챕터 11(회생절차) 을 신청했습니다.  이 회사가 운영하는 웬디스 매장은 314개점, #웬디스 미국 시스템의 약 5% 입니다. 여기에 보장글스 1개점과 독립 브랜드 5개를 더해 15개 주에서 약 9,000명을 고용하고 있고, 절차 중에도 매장 영업과 임금·복리후생 지급은 중단 없이 이어가겠다고 밝혔습니다.   주목할 대목은 신청 그 자체가 아니라 신청 이전에 이미 다 했다는 사실입니다. 회사가 5월에 낸 CEO 리포트 기준으로, 부진 매장 60개점 폐점 내부 구조조정으로 판관비·운영비 700만 달러 초과 절감 부진 매장 약 120곳에서 브렉퍼스트 철수 또는 변경 → EBITDA 마진 1,100만 달러 초과 즉시 개선 3월 EzCater 케이터링 150개점 테스트 → 5월 전면 도입 (평균 객단가 약 500달러, 10인 최소 주문) 연초 상환유예(forbearance) 요청, 2분기 중 전액 이자지급 재개 그런데도 매장단위 EBITDA 는 48% 감소했고, 가맹점 매장단위 마진은 30년 최저를 기록했습니다(소고기 인플레이션 · 전임 경영진의 대폭 할인 · 마케팅 실패).  회사는 보도자료에서 “1년 넘게 대주단 및 프랜차이저와 건설적으로 협의해 온 끝에” 법원 감독 하의 구조조정이 가장 효과적인 길이라고 판단했다고 밝혔습니다.   웬디스 본사는 최근 몇 분기 두 자릿수 동일점포매출 감소를 겪었고 신임 CEO 로버트 라이트(Robert Wright) 아래 브랜드 턴어라운드를 진...

On Thursday, Meritage Hospitality Group filed for Chapter 11 in the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Western District of Michigan. It operates 314 Wendy's restaurants — roughly 5% of the chain's U.S. system — plus one Bojangles and five independently branded concepts across 15 states, employing about 9,000 people. It says restaurant-level operations will continue and wages and benefits will be paid without disruption. What makes this worth reading closely is not the filing. It is everything that came before it. Per a May CEO report, Meritage closed 60 underperforming stores. It cut more than $7 million from general, administrative and operational expenses through internal restructuring. It exited or altered the breakfast daypart at roughly 120 underperforming locations, a move its franchisor permitted, for an immediate EBITDA margin benefit of over $11 million. It ran a catering test with EzCater at 150 restaurants in March and rolled it out fully in May. It requested forbearan...

일본 니덱(Nidec Corporation)이 자사 공시 페이지에 올린 문서는 두 개의 목록으로 되어 있습니다. 하나는 적발된 회계 처리 방법의 목록이고, 다른 하나는 날짜의 목록입니다. 먼저 방법의 목록입니다. 회사가 직접 열거한 다섯 가지는 이렇습니다. 재고자산 — 가치 없는 원재료·제품의 평가손실 계상을 회피해 비용 인식을 뒤로 미룸 고정자산 — 비현실적인 판매계획을 근거로 손상차손 계상을 부적절하게 회피 비용의 자산화 — 비용으로 계상해야 할 노무비를 고정자산으로 계상 해 비용 계상 시점을 지연 이익 인식 — 보조금 반환충당금의 부적절한 사용, 보조금의 부적절한 이익 계상 채권관리 — 회수불능 채권에 대한 대손충당금 과소 계상 다섯 항목을 나란히 놓고 보면 한 항목만 볼 때는 보이지 않던 성질이 드러납니다. 없는 거래를 만들어 낸 항목이 거의 없습니다. 대부분은 이미 일어난 일을 다른 시점으로, 또는 재무제표의 다른 칸으로 옮겨 앉힌 것입니다. 그래서 합계는 틀리지 않습니다. 틀리는 것은 「언제 일어났는가」와 「언제 적혔는가」의 대응 입니다. 확정된 수치와 아직 확정되지 않은 수치도 함께 공표됐습니다. FY2025 1분기 말 연결 순자산은 약 1,607억 엔 감소할 것으로 예상 된다고 적혀 있습니다. 반면 자동차 사업 관련 영업권·고정자산의 추가 손상 가능성은 「검토 대상 금액 약 2,500억 엔」 으로만 적혀 있고, 회사는 향후 조사 결과에 따라 변동될 수 있다고 각주를 달았습니다. 감사인은 FY2025 증권보고서에 대해 의견거절 을 표명했고, 2026년 3월 결산의 기말배당은 0 으로 결정됐습니다. 다음은 날짜의 목록입니다. 증권보고서 제출기한 연장(2025.6.27)을 기준으로 세어 보면 — 제3자위원회 설치까지 68일, 도쿄증권거래소의 특별주의 종목 지정까지 123일, 그리고 최종 조사보고서 수령과 함께 2026년 3월 결산의 공시가 다시 연기된다고 공표된 날(2026.4.27)까지 304일 입니다. 이 ...

A Japanese motor maker's remediation page is, at first glance, a dull document. It is a list of methods and a list of dates. Read it as a sequence and it becomes something else: a map of how long a record can stay unverifiable while the shares keep trading. The methods Nidec Corporation's page enumerates five categories of accounting misconduct identified across a number of its business bases. Inventory: avoiding the booking of value-less raw materials and impairment losses, postponing the recording of costs. Fixed assets: inappropriate avoidance of impairment based on unrealistic sales plans. Capitalisation of costs: recording labour cost, which should be recorded as cost, as fixed assets, to delay the timing to record it as cost. Profit recognition: inappropriate use of subsidy-return reserves and inappropriate recording of subsidies as profit. Credit management: understatement of bad-loan reserves for uncollectible loans. Read them together and a pattern appears that no ...

Late on 16 September, a KOSPI-listed company filed the arithmetic of its own rehabilitation. STX disclosed a capital reduction of 99.13%. Paid-in capital drops from KRW 426.4bn to KRW 3.7bn. Every 103 shares become one. The controlling shareholder's 11,995,657 common shares, together with 5,701,959 shares previously issued on a debt-for-equity conversion to a related party, are cancelled outright and without compensation. The record date is 6 October. Two further filings complete the picture. To convert rehabilitation claims, 139,528,385 new common shares will be issued to third parties at KRW 2,500 each, payable on the 21st. Separately, 27.2 million shares will be issued to improve the capital structure through an M&A, raising KRW 68.0bn — of which KRW 67.0bn goes to repaying debt. Payment on 12 October; listing on 6 November. What reinvestment intensity actually assumes Reinvestment Intensity Index reads three things: the reinvestment rate, the coefficient of variation in...

Two capital decisions surfaced this month on opposite sides of the Pacific, and they are easiest to understand as the two ends of a single ratio. On 14 September, a KOSDAQ-listed medical-device maker disclosed a third-party share placement. It will issue 562,500 new common shares at ₩1,760 apiece, raising ₩0.99bn, with the entire allotment going to one company. The stated use of proceeds was funds for acquiring securities of other companies, and so on. On the same trading session, the stock closed at ₩1,548. The filing report does not disclose how the issue price was set — Korean placements are typically priced off a weighted-average window with a statutory discount, so the two numbers are worth placing side by side rather than netting into a spread. On 31 August, Engine Capital LP, holding roughly 1.5% of EPAM Systems (NYSE: EPAM), wrote to the company's board asking for a $750m accelerated share repurchase, to be funded from idle cash, ongoing free cash flow and, potentially, ...

On the evening of 10 September, four KOSDAQ issuers filed equity placements. Read as a list, they are the same event four times: three raised ₩2.5bn, ₩3.0bn and ₩3.8bn, one raised ₩60bn, and every one of them stated the same use of proceeds — operating funds. Read as structure, one of the four is not in the same category as the others. The ₩60bn raise was a third-party placement of 20,000,000 new shares. The company's share count before the issue was 12,461,641. The filing that reports this is a financing disclosure by classification. By effect, it is something else: an instrument that rewrites the share register further than it rewrites the balance sheet. What the filing says, and what it does not This is worth stating precisely, because the temptation is to overshoot. The disclosure gives three things: the number of new shares, the amount raised, and the purpose. It does not identify the allottee, and it does not assert a change of control. Nothing here should be read as clai...

■ A filing that arrived after the price On 9 September a KOSDAQ-listed company closed up 13.19%. Its control-transfer filing was disclosed at 18:48 that evening, after the market had shut. The stock had traded in the 900-won range until mid-August, began climbing on 27 August, and jumped more than 17% on 7 September. Local coverage flagged the sequence as worth noting — and stopped there, which is the correct place to stop. Nothing in the public record establishes why the price moved first. But the sequence itself is a methodological problem, and this is a good week to explain how we handled it. ■ What the number is, and what it is not We analysed all 3,109 companies listed on KOSPI and KOSDAQ. Within that population, 276 experienced a trading suspension. Of those 276, 85.9% displayed a statistically significant relational signal before their financial metrics deteriorated . The signals fall into three families: board composition shifts, executive exodus, and concentrated private ...

On 20 August 2026 Korea's Fair Trade Commission conditionally approved the first transaction in the country's petrochemical restructuring programme. HD Hyundai Chemical absorbs Lotte Daesan Petrochemical — a unit Lotte Chemical spun off on 2 June — and Lotte Chemical takes additional shares as consideration. When it closes, Lotte Chemical and HD Hyundai Oilbank each hold 50% and jointly control the merged entity, and the two groups' crackers inside the Daesan complex are operated as one. The commission analysed 20 petrochemical products across 12 product markets and found a substantial competition concern in exactly two: LDPE and EVA. Suppliers there drop from four to three. By sales volume the remaining three hold 82% of LDPE and 95% of EVA, above the 75% line the reporting cited. But on capacity the three split roughly 50:25:25, and the commission itself observed that the merged party would not become the market leader. The concept: a finding that is not about size Th...

On 7 September 2026 the Korea Exchange designated a KOSPI-listed pharmaceutical maker (ticker 011000) an unfaithful-disclosure corporation. The finding is unglamorous and, precisely for that reason, worth reading closely. A lawsuit large enough to cross the reportable threshold had to be disclosed by 30 April 2026. It reached the exchange on 4 August 2026. The penalty: seven points, a ₩70m fine, and a cumulative score of 9.6 once 2.6 previously assessed points are added — against the 10.0 that, if reached within a year, opens a listing-eligibility review. The exchange also recorded that no such review is triggered today. Most coverage of an event like this stops at the fine. The more useful question is what the gap does to everything else in the record. Two clocks, briefly separated Every company runs on two clocks. One marks when something happened. The other marks when it was disclosed. In ordinary conditions the two sit close enough together that the distinction is invisible, an...

On 8 September, TheCody — a semiconductor-equipment maker listed on Korea's KOSDAQ — disclosed a ₩30bn private convertible bond. The stated use of proceeds was the acquisition of securities in other companies. Two partnerships, Goldmark and Horizon, subscribe ₩15bn each. Coupon 3%, yield-to-maturity 4%, conversion price ₩3,550 per share, payment 6 October, maturity 6 October 2029, with conversion exercisable from 6 October 2027. The company also stated plainly that the target entity and the terms of any acquisition have not been determined, and that it will disclose again once a board resolution fixes them. Separately, a third-party share placement already in progress was revised the same day: the issue price fell from ₩3,780 to ₩3,154 and the share count rose from 1,851,851 to 2,219,403, with payment due 22 September. On completion, the largest shareholder changes from Iseok Industrial Development to Pantos Corporation. The stock closed limit-up on both 7 and 8 September, moving...